Jim Dettman
jimdettman at earthlink.net
Mon Jun 26 09:13:11 CDT 2006
John, <<I could swear I did that! 8(>> Your original post said "...for Access". There are not many frameworks around for Access (the ez products are the only ones that come to mind), but there are for many other products. I was just saying you might get more input by talking about any framework rather then Access specific. <<I think that contrary to popular belief, a book about framework is not about providing a framework ready to go to solve everyone's problems, but rather about HOW you build a framework to make your job easier.>> Think you have a winner of an idea there! All developers like to be in control and yet to a certain degree, need to get ideas. Probably the toughest part for most of us (one person shops) is getting ideas bounced around. <<Ohhh... Ideas. I like it.>> I believe between all of us, we could come up with a fairly sizeable list of what might/might not be workable. <<As a combo's AfterUpdate fires, a collection of dependent objects is checked to see if any other combo's, lists or forms needs to be requeried because their contents depend on that combo. Some developers write code over and over to "requery that combo over there when this combo changes". I wrote a dependent object collection that every data aware control class contains, and whenever specific events in that control fire, the dependent object collection is examined and if there are any class pointers in it, the requery method of that class is called. >> This is exactly the type of thing I was thinking about when I was talking about Access being able to use features of a framework now that it could not have had in the past. I think Access is at the point where a simple framework might be doable, but because your limited in what you can hook into, you'll still end up with a framework as being more of a collection of tool/utilities rather then actual pre-written code to do it all for you. Although I could be wrong. It's amazing what some folks have accomplished over the years. <<So a book about building a framework is NOT about handing you a full fledged framework and explaining how it works, but rather explaining what reusable code is, what functions and subs are, what modules are, what libraries are, what classes are, how to place classes in libraries and yet expose them to the application, what a framework is, how you build one, and why you would do any or all of the above.>> Like I said, sounds like a great idea<g>. Jim. -----Original Message----- From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of JWColby Sent: Monday, June 26, 2006 9:51 AM To: 'Access Developers discussion and problem solving' Subject: Re: [AccessD] Frameworks <<snip>>