Bobby Heid
bheid at appdevgrp.com
Mon May 15 14:47:45 CDT 2006
Thanks Marty. I'll check that out. Bobby -----Original Message----- From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of MartyConnelly Sent: Monday, May 15, 2006 1:40 PM To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving Subject: Re: [AccessD] To re-link or not to re-link... When re-linking try to keep one table open during relink process to avoid opening and closing ldb file, remove subdatasheets on backend tables. Once the first table has been refreshed, open a recordset based on that table. Continue refreshing. Once finished refreshing close the recordset after you've opened a bound form (perhaps hidden) for performance reasons <../performancefaq.htm>. Performance FAQ's See http://www.granite.ab.ca/access/performanceldblocking.htm and also http://www.granite.ab.ca/access/performancefaq.htm Bobby Heid wrote: >Hey, > >We have a system that was originally developed in Access 97. There were a >number of tables that were linked to the FE. There were issues (not sure >what they were as no one remembers and I did not write the original) with >the system if the tables were not re-linked each time the system is loaded. > >Well, here we are today and the app has grown into Access XP. The system >has grown and now has over 100 tables. As such, it takes about .6 seconds >per table to re-link them all. > >Does anyone know what the issues may have been before and if they still >exist in Access XP? Anyone have any pointers to further information? > >Thanks, >Bobby > > > -- Marty Connelly Victoria, B.C. Canada