Stuart McLachlan
stuart at lexacorp.com.pg
Tue Nov 14 15:15:39 CST 2006
On 14 Nov 2006 at 10:20, artful at rogers.com wrote: > All these years I have been under the (clearly false) impression that > precise population-numbers defined these terms. Apparently I have wrong, lo > these decades. I have just taken a local poll (only 4 people) and the > agreement here is that a city is 100,000 people or more; a town is 999,999 > people or fewer; a village is 2,000 people or fewer; a hamlet is 500 people > or fewer. We four Canadians readily agreed on these numbers, but that might > be something we picked up in school that has no relation to the larger > world. > In the UK, a city was originally a town with a cathedral. It is an actual status conferred on an urban area by the monarch. I believe that in the US, individual states define their own cities in legislation. -- Stuart