Jim Lawrence
accessd at shaw.ca
Thu Aug 9 00:15:43 CDT 2007
Well, you have probably already thought of this, but any queries that can run on the SQL server as pre-compiled stored procedures will give superior performance. Jim -----Original Message----- From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Mark A Matte Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2007 1:57 PM To: accessd at databaseadvisors.com Subject: [AccessD] SQL Speed Hello All, I am involved in a project that will be web based. The database will either be access or SQL Server. The question is: I need to run a bunch (maybe 10K) of SQL statements againts a single table...or flat file, whatever is best, containing about 4K rows. The results of each will be appended to a second table, or emailed instantly (ahh...idea...good place for a JC style Class). The SQL statements themselves will be stored in a table. Does anyone have any ideas/suggestions about approach? I will need ALL of the SQLs to run in less than 5 minutes. I know 1 runs in a fraction of a second...I just don't know what that fraction is to calculate time needed. Being there are so few rows involved...but so many SQL statements...and speed is an issue...will there be a signicant advantage using SQL Server or Access? I'm thinking of having the SQLs in a table and looping through and executing each...I just don't know if this is the best approach? Thanks, Mark A. Matte _________________________________________________________________ Booking a flight? Know when to buy with airfare predictions on MSN Travel. http://travel.msn.com/Articles/aboutfarecast.aspx&ocid=T001MSN25A07001 -- AccessD mailing list AccessD at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com