jwcolby
jwcolby at colbyconsulting.com
Thu Aug 30 11:16:57 CDT 2007
Shamil, I have one specific client who is firmly implanted in 800x600 mode. Even though he is upgrading all of the 15" and smaller monitors to at least 18" his users complain bitterly if they cannot stay in 800x600 mode ("eye strain"). This is a real application, not a toy - it completely runs a disability insurance call center. It has a main form with a tab control with more than 15 tabs. Each tab has either controls on it or JIT subforms. The tabs are already crammed with controls. The client WANTS it that way. I cannot do ANYTHING to this thing without slider bars appearing at the bottom and right edge because I have pushed the size of the main form out past the edges of the 800x600 screen. ALL of my clients use a database which performs a purpose. They hire people with NO experience in Access (or even excel or word) to use an application to get work done. The application does precisely and only what the BUSINESS OWNER wants done. The employees do not play around doing stuff, they work - click buttons, open reports, enter and display data. These people wouldn't know a report design view if it bit them in the behind nor are they allowed to. They don't build their own tables, or queries, or reports. They have highly technical skills which involve processing insurance claims (for example), NOT changing the application. Now throw in Access 2007 and tell me where you are at. The users don't NEED the ribbons - PERIOD. They use the forms to enter data and to display data about the claims. They are not designing ANYTHING. Not changing fonts, not building queries or reports, not... Well you get the picture. Toolbars take up screen real estate for absolutely ZERO gain. We are not talking some gain, or little gain, we are talking ZERO GAIN. Access is NOT an "office application" in my universe, it is a way to design a database to a customer spec. A HUGE part of that spec is that the users don't dick around with the application, they do what they are told, when they are told, how they are told. If they need functionality they say so and the business owner decides whether, when and how to add it. Hey, that sounds a bit like software design in the non-office world. John W. Colby Colby Consulting www.ColbyConsulting.com -----Original Message----- From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Shamil Salakhetdinov Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2007 11:49 AM To: 'Access Developers discussion and problem solving' Subject: Re: [AccessD] What problems converting A2K3 mdb to A2K7? Hello John, Recently I had to work with MS Access 2007 because there were no other options available around as e.g. to use MS Access 2003... I must say that in a few hours I started to feel that MS Access 2007 ribbon is more useful (more ergonomic) than that of MS Office 2003 - one just have to adapt to it... And of course having several tables, queries, forms,... opened and being able to switch between them using tabs - just one this feature is worth to switch to MS Access 2007 :) Just IMO of course. Thanks. -- Shamil -----Original Message----- From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of jwcolby Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2007 7:20 PM To: 'Access Developers discussion and problem solving' Subject: Re: [AccessD] What problems converting A2K3 mdb to A2K7? And that seems to be the problem. The ribbon bars are all about the user and ignore the needs and wants of developers. As a developer I know where everything is. I click menu items all day, use shortcut keys, do things automatically. Now suddenly all that stuff doesn't work and I can't get any work done. This stuff is know as "muscle memory" and it is a well documented fact. Your body just "learns" how to do things, everything from typing to playing an instrument to holding a fork to walking. Imagine handing a sax player a saxophone where all of the keys are randomly changed. Now imagine handing that to a professional musician with a concert to play that night, where he is being paid thousands of dollars to play. Now imagine handing such instruments to every member of the orchestra. It is bad enough to do that to my users, but I charge my clients hundreds of dollars an hour to hunt down where they hid everything. My clients are NOT HAPPY and they are NOT HAPPY with ME!!! John W. Colby Colby Consulting www.ColbyConsulting.com -----Original Message-----