jwcolby
jwcolby at colbyconsulting.com
Thu Dec 20 12:48:15 CST 2007
LOL. I am sure that was in the mix somewhere, right up there with the sales edict that it come in under $600. ;-) John W. Colby Colby Consulting www.ColbyConsulting.com -----Original Message----- From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Gary Kjos Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2007 1:16 PM To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving Subject: Re: [AccessD] Windows Home Server update One reviewer on Amazon stated that HP specifically used a less powerful chip to reduce POWER and HEAT so it could run quieter. GK On 12/20/07, jwcolby <jwcolby at colbyconsulting.com> wrote: > > I would expect the cost of those two changes to be a lot more then $50. > Memory is running at $100/GB right now and going from a Celeron chip > to a dual core must be a hundred at least. > > Nope. > > Memory: > > http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.aspx?Submit=ENE&N=2010170147 > +10521 > 08080+1052416064+1052308477&name=2GB+(2+x+1GB) > > Assuming an economy memory you can take you pick of two 1g sticks for > under $50. I actually ordered this: > > http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16820231098 > > > As for processors, here are the X2 choice for AMD: > > http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.aspx?Submit=ENE&N=2+50001028 > +40000 > 343+1051720996+1050717007&name=Athlon+64+X2 > > Notice that I "quoted" the Celeron. The HP actually uses the AMD "Celeron" > equivalent. Which exact one I can't tell but if I assume the absolute > cheapest: > > http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819104240 > > Then the upgrade to: > > http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819103066 > > Is a mere $36. The processing power increase for that $36 is well > worth the money (to me). > > Now obviously it COULD cost much more than $50 to upgrade if you > wanted high end dual cores and high end memory but I can do that > later. A faster Proc will do more than faster memory so I will no > doubt just keep this memory and MAYBE someday bump the proc to a 5 or > 6 GHz X2 or even a quad (assuming my MB can handle a quad). I am > trying to build a WHS first, then see if anything else shakes out that > needs more power. I really just want the automated full system backup for every machine in the house. > > John W. Colby > Colby Consulting > www.ColbyConsulting.com > -----Original Message----- > From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com > [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Jim Dettman > Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2007 12:09 PM > To: 'Access Developers discussion and problem solving' > Subject: Re: [AccessD] Windows Home Server update > > John, > > <<Of course my build has a dual core and 2 gigs of ram instead of a > "celeron" level single core and 512M memory. Other than that the > specs are pretty similar, and those changes cost about $50.>> > > I would expect the cost of those two changes to be a lot more then $50. > Memory is running at $100/GB right now and going from a Celeron chip > to a dual core must be a hundred at least. > > Jim. > -- Gary Kjos garykjos at gmail.com -- AccessD mailing list AccessD at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com