jwcolby
jwcolby at colbyconsulting.com
Mon Dec 31 09:04:37 CST 2007
Michael, XP and above will do a software raid. The problem with all such raids is that the read and in particular the WRITE times are abysmal as in under 5 mbytes / sec, whereas any single disk usually has a read / write time in the neighborhood of 40-60 mbytes / second. I think what is going on is that the raid process requires a lot of computation (called an XOR compute) that has to be done by the processor if there is no hardware assistance (dedicated co-processor). I am guessing that MS throttles that process to avoid using all of the processor time in doing this processing. That was probably necessary back in 2002 when XP hit the scenes but now we have 4X the power and 2-4X the cores and it is my opinion that the software raid or software assisted raid (controllers without the co-processor) could probably work very well and very fast IF MS would let the XOR processor have more processor time. Just speculation of course. What I know for sure is that I ran software raid and it was so bad that it was essentially unusable (Raid 5). I think people do use Raid 0 but that has no data protection, it is all about speeding up reads. I need Raid 5 or 6 and doing that without a hardware co-processor is just not possible at this time. John W. Colby Colby Consulting www.ColbyConsulting.com -----Original Message----- From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Michael Bahr Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2007 5:52 PM To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving Subject: Re: [AccessD] WHS on Raid Hi John, I found this link that uses XP Pro for software raid. Apparently this feature has been disabled in XP. http://www.tomshardware.com/2004/11/19/using_windowsxp_to_make_raid_5_happen / Mike...