Bryan Carbonnell
carbonnb at gmail.com
Wed Feb 7 09:43:25 CST 2007
On 2/6/07, JWColby <jwcolby at colbyconsulting.com> wrote: > Given the possibility of having multiples, I would probably have the > individual object tables, then one big m-m "relationship" table where I > placed: > > PEID > FACID > HDWRID > SFTWRID > SVCAGRID > > > Probably you would want other info about the relationship such as when the > relationship was established and when the relationship terminated: > > DteEst > DteTerm > > "multiples" come from new records in the relationship table. > > A person assigned two pieces of software would be two records, with just the > peid and softwareid, plus the DteEst. When that person "turned in" the > software, the record's DteTerm would be updated. > > The only issue with this kind of relationship is that one relationship could > be terminated while another was not. If that is possible, then each > relationship needs to be established individually (separate records in the > relationship table), so that you can record when each relationship was > established and terminated. Merci. -- Bryan Carbonnell - carbonnb at gmail.com Life's journey is not to arrive at the grave safely in a well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting "What a great ride!"