[AccessD] Code Library, Sample Database, Etc.

Robert,

With A2007, what will you tell people to use for a security mechanism.
Granted, the Access security model in previous versions was nominal, but for
me it worked well enough for my small business customers.  

Thanks!
Dan Waters

-----Original Message-----
From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
[mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Robert L. Stewart
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 4:12 PM
To: accessd at databaseadvisors.com
Subject: Re: [AccessD] Code Library, Sample Database, Etc.

William,

PERSONAL OPINION FOLLOWING...

With the advent of MSDE and SQL Express, Access as a BE
should have disappeared. Even if you use an MDE against
it.  I have used Access since 1.0, co-authored a book on
it for Access 97, and taught a Special Interest Group since
1.0. Yes, with an extremely well designed front end and
back end Access will work wonders. However, with the members
of this group excluded, I have yet to see a really well
designed combination of the two. There are simply too many
people that think that is they can spell "Access Programmer,"
they are one.

ADO and DAO are irrelevant.  Pick your poison and use it.
Where I work now, we use both.

In my special interest group, we do not use Access for a BE.
I have stopped teaching the use of it and only showing SQL
Server.

Biased, you bet. Too many corrupt data files over the years
in Access.  Never had one in SQL Server. And I have been
using it since 3.21.  :-)

Robert

P.S.

Charlotte, I had my asbestos long johns on before I wrote it.  :-)
Fried or flamed, no problem.


At 03:35 PM 2/20/2007, you wrote:
>Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 14:23:44 -0500
>From: "William Hindman" <wdhindman at dejpolsystems.com>
>Subject: Re: [AccessD] Code Library, Sample Database, Etc.
>To: "Access Developers discussion and problem solving"
>         <accessd at databaseadvisors.com>
>Message-ID: <001701c75524$a3de0a90$9258eb44 at 50NM721>
>Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="Windows-1252";
>         reply-type=original
>
>Arthur
>
>...its not a matter of agreeing or disagreeing ...if you work in an
>environment where SS is available and the notwork resources are available
to
>support it, of course you would use SS in most applications.
>
>...but if you are a consultant working with many small businesses where you
>are it, then a well designed dao mdb fe/be can be highly stable and work
>every bit as well as an adp/SS combo ...in point of fact with up to at
least
>15 users a well designed dao based mdb will normally out perform an ado
>based fe.
>
>...and with A'07 it appears that MS itself is moving back to the dao model
>...what irks me is people declaring that their favorite model is best for
>everyone ...or casting unwarranted aspersions on Access be's and dao when
>they really don't work in an environment where that model functions best.
>
>William Hindman


-- 
AccessD mailing list
AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com