William Hindman
wdhindman at dejpolsystems.com
Wed Feb 21 08:13:00 CST 2007
...sure thing gustav William Hindman ----- Original Message ----- From: "Gustav Brock" <Gustav at cactus.dk> To: <accessd at databaseadvisors.com> Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2007 7:18 AM Subject: Re: [AccessD] Code Library, Sample Database, Etc. > Hi William > > Our experiences match your comments. > Corruptions - as few as they are - have never been related to Access/JET > but some outside source, mostly network issues. > > When you have chosen your backend SQL engine, would you mind sharing your > considerations? > > /gustav > >>>> wdhindman at dejpolsystems.com 21-02-2007 00:09:44 >>> > Robert > > ...msde's proved impractical because of scaling limitations MS built in > ...so you're really only talking about SQL Express which is what, months > old? > > ...and if your only problem with an Access be is corruption, then sorry, > but > with the exception of cheap NICS I've not seen a corrupted mdb since A95 > ...except in client's I took over from other developers and had to rebuild > ...and thus corruption is not, in my environment, sufficient cause to > spend > the time and money to convert to a non-JET be ...but I'll grant you that > I'm > getting long in the tooth and damned reluctant to learn every new db > wonder > cure that comes along. > > ...and while I'm at it, I'll also admit that I'm developing a commercial > app > based on a current client that will use a non-JET be because it needs to > scale to at least 50 users ...what that will be depends on some testing > yet > to be accomplished but I'm not at all convinced that SQL Express isn't a > one-off dog & pony show for MS. > > William Hindman > > > -- > AccessD mailing list > AccessD at databaseadvisors.com > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com >