Mark Breen
marklbreen at gmail.com
Tue Jun 19 13:26:10 CDT 2007
Hello Steve, I have been looking at a few hosting companies, including webhost4life. I am seeking a hosting solution for a project that will be SQL Server 2005 / ASP.Net based. and it will be used by three or four people 8 hours per day. At certain times of the year, (Jan - March), there will be a surge of users, maybe up to 20 or 30 per day. We will be accepting payments, so it will be a reasonably important part of my customers business. Do you think that a shared server delivers sufficient performance? I am intrigued by acheiving hosting for such small sums of money, and if it works, I would love to be able to tell my customer about how inexpensive it it. On the otherhand, if your experience is that it can be very slow, I will avoid the shared hosting and go for some form of a dedicated box, even if that is a virtual server. Thanks for any advice you or anyone else may have Mark On 23/05/07, Steve Schapel <miscellany at mvps.org> wrote: > > Jim, > > I do a lot of stuff in an account at www.webhost4life.com. I have been > very happy with them, and as far as I know, you can't beat their > features/dollar offerings. > > For excellence in support and service, www.orcsweb.com are fantastic, > but the price is a lot higher. > > Regards > Steve > > Jim Lawrence wrote: > > Hi All: > > > > Would anyone be able to recommend a web hosting company? The site would > have > > to support Microsoft products like ASP, ASP.Net and MS SQL. A good price > is > > a definite plus. > > > -- > AccessD mailing list > AccessD at databaseadvisors.com > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com >