Mark Breen
marklbreen at gmail.com
Tue Jun 19 15:38:05 CDT 2007
Hi John, Thanks for that, we will be hosting an application, and while it usually has a small number of users, 3- 6 people, it will be hit every ten minutes for day to day transactions. My gut is starting to tell me that I need either a vpn server or else a dedicated box, our users are accustomed to sub second, or max one to two second response times. from what you are describing, we would not get that on a shared plan. Hmmm, decisions to make... Thanks for the response, good look with the weekend, wish I could be there, Mark On 19/06/07, jwcolby <jwcolby at colbyconsulting.com> wrote: > > Mark, > > My web site is on WebHost4Life and while I like them OK, I must say that > the > initial response time is not the best. The way they get such low prices > is > hosting dozens or even hundreds of sites on a single box. If you get a > lot > of hits per day, then it might stay cached on their server and the > response > time might be OK. My site gets a few hits a week I would guess and does > NOT > stay cached, and can take as long as 30 seconds or a minute to get loaded > and return the first page. After it is loaded, then the response times > seem > to be fine. > > John W. Colby > Colby Consulting > www.ColbyConsulting.com > -----Original Message----- > From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com > [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Mark Breen > Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2007 2:26 PM > To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving > Subject: Re: [AccessD] Web site Hosting Companies > > Hello Steve, > > I have been looking at a few hosting companies, including webhost4life. > > I am seeking a hosting solution for a project that will be SQL Server 2005 > / > ASP.Net based. and it will be used by three or four people 8 hours per > day. > At certain times of the year, (Jan - March), there will be a surge of > users, > maybe up to 20 or 30 per day. We will be accepting payments, so it will > be > a reasonably important part of my customers business. > > Do you think that a shared server delivers sufficient performance? I am > intrigued by acheiving hosting for such small sums of money, and if it > works, I would love to be able to tell my customer about how inexpensive > it > it. On the otherhand, if your experience is that it can be very slow, I > will avoid the shared hosting and go for some form of a dedicated box, > even > if that is a virtual server. > > Thanks for any advice you or anyone else may have > > Mark > > > > On 23/05/07, Steve Schapel <miscellany at mvps.org> wrote: > > > > Jim, > > > > I do a lot of stuff in an account at www.webhost4life.com. I have > > been very happy with them, and as far as I know, you can't beat their > > features/dollar offerings. > > > > For excellence in support and service, www.orcsweb.com are fantastic, > > but the price is a lot higher. > > > > Regards > > Steve > > > > Jim Lawrence wrote: > > > Hi All: > > > > > > Would anyone be able to recommend a web hosting company? The site > > > would > > have > > > to support Microsoft products like ASP, ASP.Net and MS SQL. A good > > > price > > is > > > a definite plus. > > > > > -- > > AccessD mailing list > > AccessD at databaseadvisors.com > > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd > > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com > > > -- > AccessD mailing list > AccessD at databaseadvisors.com > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com > > -- > AccessD mailing list > AccessD at databaseadvisors.com > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com >