Arthur Fuller
fuller.artful at gmail.com
Sat May 5 08:02:41 CDT 2007
Guilty, your honour. There's a version of Python that runs on .NET, but before suggesting that you go there, the first thing I would do in your place is satisfy yourself that it's not PostGres that is responsible for your performance problems. What happens performance-wise if you create an Access FE and an ODBC link and do direct queries against the database? How is performance there? Arthur On 5/5/07, Bruce Bruen <bbruen at unwired.com.au> wrote: > > hi all, > someone mentioned python a few minutes ago, ?arthur? > > whoever it was, have they got a link for a decent howto or getting > started? > > I'm looking to port an A2K3 to (ahem) a more "significant" platform. The > data > has already been ported to postgresql and after some hysteria is now ANSI > compliant. The FE exists in access and has been partially ported to C#, > but > I'm not really happy with the C# implementation. The data abstraction is > a > PITA (waiting hopefully on Charlottes tutorial), the performance is > somewhat > slack from a perception basis (i.e. perceptively slower than > access-postgres > and bordering on infuriatingly slower than access FE/BE architecture) and > the > IDE's are all a royal PITA (VB5, eclipse and #develop), as mentioned > elsewhere they all want to / support direct data binding. > > I have read some (i.e. 1-2%) of the available info on python and it looks > pretty rich, but is there something between HelloWorld and pyQt? > > -- > regards > > Bruce >