Mark A Matte
markamatte at hotmail.com
Mon May 14 13:42:05 CDT 2007
I was also wondering this. I have a desktop at home running 2000 Server...that has been running 24/7 for over 3 years. Every 30 minutes it retrieves stock data files(via FTP),unzips them, imports into Access, analyzes the data, does historical comparison, then emails the data to a number of phones(if anything matches criteria). This is the only thing thing this box does aside from some periodic development...and the only problems I have had was 1 hard drive failure...and my email crashed...Neither an OS problem...other than that...this thing has never had an issue. By no means am I an expert on OS's...but of the 15 or so machines I've had, running Win95,Win98,Win2000,Win ME(it came on the machine, not my choice),and XP.....2000Server has been the most stable machine I have ever had. Just curious, Mark A. Matte >From: Jim Lawrence <accessd at shaw.ca> >Reply-To: Access Developers discussion and problem >solving<accessd at databaseadvisors.com> >To: "'Access Developers discussion and problem >solving'"<accessd at databaseadvisors.com> >Subject: Re: [AccessD] VB.Net - seeing the messagebox >Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 09:47:16 -0700 > >Hi Gustav: > >Why is having a server as a desktop not a good idea? These are the reasons >I >would recommend it: > >1. It runs more stably. Rarely crashes and I do put it through its paces. >XP >on the other hand can freeze up easily when pushed too hard. >2. Has great built-in security. It can not even be seen on the LAN if that >is your requirement. >3. Full admin terminal services built not just a single user. You can >easily >remote in from a clients site. >4. Easy communications with remote/local and different OS like Mac/Linux... >try that with an XP box without a lot of fuss. >5. Runs multiple resource heavy apps without grinding to a halt or just >crashing: like a couple of web servers, a couple of SQL servers 2000/2005, >virtual server and throw in a resource hungry graphic program. Try running >Oracle Enterprise 10g on an XP box.... yeh-right. >6. Runs multi-versions of development apps, like Access, VB, Visual >Studio... >7. For all these heavy duty programs the system can actually take full >advantage of the entire RAM that can be crammed in the box. XP will look at >the memory but will not necessarily do anything with it. > >I do not recommend this much load but for you multi-tasking power >users...my >recommendation is if you have the opportunity is to run a nice Windows 2003 >standard server. It has a lot more complexity than the standard desktop and >will not always play nice with other servers on the LAN but has all the >tools to taming it. ...After all many Linux distros have the capabilities >of being full-blown, multi-user, multi-tasking servers with a pretty >interface. > >Jim > >-----Original Message----- >From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com >[mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Gustav Brock >Sent: Monday, May 14, 2007 1:01 AM >To: accessd at databaseadvisors.com >Subject: Re: [AccessD] VB.Net - seeing the messagebox > >Hi John > >A server OS for desktop use? Not a good idea. >Perhaps your programs miss priority? Look up My Computer, Properties, >Advanced, Performance, Settings, Advanced. > >/gustav > > >>> jwcolby at colbyconsulting.com 14-05-2007 04:07 >>> > >No he's using VISTA....Heheheheheh. > >Nope, Windows 2003 Standard Edition. Essentially XP on steroids I think. > > > >-- >AccessD mailing list >AccessD at databaseadvisors.com >http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd >Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com > >-- >AccessD mailing list >AccessD at databaseadvisors.com >http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd >Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com _________________________________________________________________ PC Magazines 2007 editors choice for best Web mailaward-winning Windows Live Hotmail. http://imagine-windowslive.com/hotmail/?locale=en-us&ocid=TXT_TAGHM_migration_HM_mini_pcmag_0507