William Hindman
wdhindman at dejpolsystems.com
Fri Apr 25 09:12:32 CDT 2008
...but as a consultant I don't have to fight that battle ...small business owners don't give a hoot what tools I use as long as I can make it do what they want :) ...not doing that 9-5 crap ever again ...rather starve ...which is of course, always possible :) William -------------------------------------------------- From: "jwcolby" <jwcolby at colbyconsulting.com> Sent: Friday, April 25, 2008 9:31 AM To: "Access Developers discussion and problem solving" <accessd at databaseadvisors.com> Subject: Re: [AccessD] FW: Access 2007 (and other rants) > Because "real men don't use VB.net". > > Or because company executives are ignorant and believe that "real men > don't code in vb.net" and so won't hire you unless you code in c#. > > Microsoft themselves will tell you that both languages are a thin veneer > over the .net framework, both languages call into the .net CLR to do > everything and the actual differences between the two languages are > extremely minimal. That said, c# can do a few things that vb.net > cannot. OTOH vb.net can do a few things that c# cannot. > > In the end, the "VB is a toy" is so deeply ingrained in the corporate > culture that it really isn't worth fighting. > > If you make the switch though you will (potentially) earn twice the > hourly rate since c# is a REAL man's language and everybody knows you > have to pay real men more. > > ;-) > > Hewson, Jim wrote: >> William, >> Why did you move to C# instead of staying with VB? >> I've attempted to "read" C# code and it really doesn't make sense to me. >> It could be that I'm not accustomed to it. >> >> Jim >> jhewson at nciinc.com >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com >> [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of William >> Hindman >> Sent: Friday, April 25, 2008 8:08 AM >> To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving >> Subject: Re: [AccessD] FW: Access 2007 (and other rants) >> >> ...I tried both Iron Speed and CCS as code generators and wound up >> throwing >> them out in favor of coding it myself ...just too many compromises and >> restrictions for me ...I wasn't willing to settle for what they put out >> and >> thus spent as much or more time customizing their code than if I'd just >> done >> it myself ...the real productivity tool for me was finding some really >> good >> net resources and then building my own code library ...once that was in >> place, I could really start using the huge variety of tools in the .net >> framework where a simple one liner can bring a lot more results than you >> could ever dream of in Access. >> >> ...I will make one comment though ...I knew AccessD was invaluable to me >> in >> learning and working with Access ...but it wasn't until I got into >> asp.net >> and c# and found no similar resource community that I realized just how >> valuable it truly was and remains even now ...don't know why that is but >> I've looked all over the net for more than a year now and just not found >> the >> equivalent ...not even close. >> >> William > > -- > John W. Colby > www.ColbyConsulting.com > -- > AccessD mailing list > AccessD at databaseadvisors.com > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com >