Eric Barro
ebarro at verizon.net
Sun Mar 30 16:50:05 CDT 2008
No problem, it's good that you did point out the fact that SP involves a laborious process because it does (it involves a thorough knowledge of Windows Server 2003, Active Directory, SQL server 2000/20005, ASP.NET and javascript) if you wanted to deploy it on your own system. -----Original Message----- From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Susan Harkins Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2008 12:31 PM To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving Subject: Re: [AccessD] Some Advice on Web Front end and ? backend I understand -- I wasn't objecting to anything you recommended, just adding an "in addition to." I don't know enough about either SP or OL, so whether a SP hosted solution would be more efficient that Office Live, I couldn't say -- just putting it out there. If I sounded pushy, I apologize -- certainly didn't mean to. Susan H. > That's why I recommended a hosted solution instead of a local > deployment Susan. > > > It's just my opinion, but SharePoint is a laborious process and not > something a small or even a growing business might want to invest in. > If SharePoint isn't right for your client, check out Office Live Small > Business. I'm just looking into it myself. > -- AccessD mailing list AccessD at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com