Charlotte Foust
cfoust at infostatsystems.com
Mon Aug 3 16:09:03 CDT 2009
Can I vote twice? Three times? I've worked with all of them except 2007, which I merely struggled with and threw rocks at and 95, which I tried, and ran screaming from. I'd say Access 1.1 because it could be programmed, Access 97 because it was a total workhorse, and 2002 because it was another rock-solid product. The others had a few elaborations (and a lot of frustrations). Charlotte Foust -----Original Message----- From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Susan Harkins Sent: Monday, August 03, 2009 1:57 PM To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving Subject: Re: [AccessD] Version history No, just a vote for your all-time favorite version, so no, 2010 doesn't make the list yet. I never worked with 1.0, but I thought 2.0 was pretty cool. ;) Susan H. > Or your preferred version? I vote for 1.0 because it started the game. -- AccessD mailing list AccessD at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com