Shamil Salakhetdinov
shamil at smsconsulting.spb.ru
Mon Aug 3 16:17:30 CDT 2009
1.1 was pretty stable and useful too. 2.0 brought quite some "headaches" because it forced to redo quite some data manipulation coding. In the same time 2.0 introduced flexible run-time manipulation/enumeration of MS Access objects... 1. 2003 2. 97 3. 2.0 -- Shamil -----Original Message----- From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Susan Harkins Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2009 12:57 AM To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving Subject: Re: [AccessD] Version history No, just a vote for your all-time favorite version, so no, 2010 doesn't make the list yet. I never worked with 1.0, but I thought 2.0 was pretty cool. ;) Susan H. > Or your preferred version? I vote for 1.0 because it started the game. -- AccessD mailing list AccessD at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4302 (20090803) __________ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.esetnod32.ru __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 4302 (20090803) __________ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.esetnod32.ru