[AccessD] Moderator Message

Re JC: yeah he did it so well all the questions   have been answered. :)

R

-----Original Message-----
From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
[mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of William Hindman
Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 9:56 AM
To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving
Subject: Re: [AccessD] Moderator Message

...I'm with the wondrous (OK, nefarious) JC on this

...as one of those responsible for initially splitting the lists, I remember
that bandwidth was a major driver since so many of our members were still on
dial up ...splitting the lists allowed them to get only the Access related
posts without having to dl the rest over 56kb connections.

...that is no longer the case

...the current board ought to consider reintegrating some of the lists
...not OT ...but others with low traffic.

...JC is, unfortunately, right about the list being dead far too often these
days.

...and John, this is not a hit on you ...you're just doing your job and I
appreciate just how well you do it.

William

--------------------------------------------------
From: "jwcolby" <jwcolby at colbyconsulting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2009 11:44 AM
To: "Access Developers discussion and problem solving" 
<accessd at databaseadvisors.com>
Subject: Re: [AccessD] Moderator Message

> John,
>
> It is my opinion that we have lost sight of the reasons for the other 
> lists to begin with.
>
> In the beginning was AccessD, and AccessD was with us, and AccessD was 
> us, and it was good.
>
> Then came a ton of traffic, and AccessD became overloaded, and OT was 
> created to move some of the more ... lively... traffic off.  AccessD 
> was good again.
>
> As the world evolved and Access spread across the face of the world, 
> AccessD again became overloaded and so other lists were created to 
> channel specific interests, and AccessD was good again.
>
> But as the evil Microsoft pushed its agenda and .Net spread across the 
> world, interest in Access began to wane.  Still protected by the 
> demigods, jealously pushing anything not Access related off to the 
> other lists, AccessD began to die.
>
> Now AccessD is a lonely place, devoid of life that was once so plentiful.
>
> But the wondrous (OK, nefarious) JC, bringer of great debates, wanders 
> through the lonely landscape wondering if things must remain this way 
> until the final day.  Perhaps it is time to renew the banter, the OT 
> discussions, to breath fresh life into a dying world.
> Perhaps it is time to merge
> the other lists, once so necessary, back into AccessD so that the once 
> mighty list can again have meaning in the lonely lives of so many 
> developers around the world.
>
> The wondrous (OK, nefarious) JC would speak his humble mind and 
> suggest that the OT list remain untouched, available for the more ... 
> lively... crowd, and that perhaps all the other lists be merged back 
> into AccessD.
>
> John W. Colby
> www.ColbyConsulting.com
>
>
> John Bartow wrote:
>> John, it's because we've added the other lists.
>>
>> We've previously discussed Windows Home Server on the dba-tech list. 
>> I have a WHS and I'd like to discuss it with someone I know has it 
>> also.
>>
>> We've previously discussed search engines on the DBA-tech and DBA-OT 
>> list.
>>
>> I am subscribed to every list Database Advisors has. I use Outlook 
>> 2007 via DSL. If it can receive and sort mail into relevant folders 
>> without a problem
>> - I'm sure every other email client on a high speed connection can too.
>> Please subscribe to those lists, as I and many others have, and you 
>> will feel that old camaraderie again.
>>
>> The more the merrier!
>>
> --
> AccessD mailing list
> AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
> 

-- 
AccessD mailing list
AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com