jwcolby
jwcolby at colbyconsulting.com
Thu Aug 6 11:58:38 CDT 2009
> Of course, we could do nothing, and watch the list slowly die like a knitting circle at an old folk's home. Hey! At my age that is not a metaphor I enjoy hearing. ;) John W. Colby www.ColbyConsulting.com Kenneth Ismert wrote: > In the minds of most subscribers, AccessD = Database Advisors, so this is a > critical discussion for the group. > > It's obvious that the quality and volume of the AccessD discussion has > declined, even though the quality of the participants has remained > consistent. > > In my view, this discussion boils down to one question: Is the Access > development market declining? > If the answer is No, then we must ask what we must do to attract newbies and > keep the list vital and fresh. > If the answer is Yes, then we must consider ways of evolving the list to > keep up with changing times. > > I think that the web is doing us in, one way or the other. Either we are > being out-competed for newbies by more modern, web-based sources of > technical information, or web-based data applications are out-competing > Access as the newbie application development platform of choice. > > I am surprised that Andy and Stuart are surprised that other lists like > dba-Tech aren't getting use. Take a look at the current mailing lists page: > it show 13 options, 8 of which are clearly irrelevant to any newcomer. > dba-Tech is buried near the bottom. This screen provides NO reason why > someone should read, let alone subscribe to, anything below the top option. > I think the majority have resoundingly spoken with their subscription > preferences. > > Getting new subscribers is critical to the succeass of AccessD/Database > Advisors. This means, at the very least, retooling the Database Advisors > site and lists to be easier to use and find, and at most, reinventing > Database Advisors itself so it is relevant to a new generation of database > programmers. > > Of course, we could do nothing, and watch the list slowly die like a > knitting circle at an old folk's home. > > -Ken