Paul Rodgers
paulrster at gmail.com
Mon Jun 29 04:48:13 CDT 2009
Well spoken, William. All that crowd listens to is a Niagara Falls jingle of cash. Their only system that appeared to be ok when it was offered to the public was 3.1. Since then, each new version has possessed major faults, yet each time they make an even bigger killing. To make these changes in 2007 can only be for a desired increase in profit - and the fellow is already the wealthiest in the world. The last people they hear are their present customers. Don't relent, William. You are right. Best wishes paul 2009/6/28 William Hindman <wdhindman at dejpolsystems.com> > Steve > > "In spite of your insulting comments" Steve > > ...just so we're clear here ...I find your entire thread on this insulting > to those of us who make a living day in and day out with MS products ...you > talk as if we're spoiled brats unable to appreciate the wondrous changes MS > wrought for us with A2007 ...imnsho, you appear more interested in > maintaining your mvps tag than you are in listening to those who are here > daily and have been here for years working with MS Access and defending it > against all comers ...if MS WAS listening ...at all ...to working > developers, they'd have at least tried to fix serious bugs that have been > in > the system for three or more versions ...Allen Browne has had the list > posted for years now and updates it frequently ...every time MS asks what > we'd like to see in the next version, that list has been submitted ...over > and over and over ...and what did the wondrous Access 2007 development team > fix? > > ...they "fixed" the freakin' menu ...which was NOT broken ...at least not > before they "fixed" it. > > ...did they fix the long standing bugs? ...yeah, right. > > ...and I'll lay you any odds you like the list won't be fixed in A2010 > ...but the ribbon will still be there, eh > > ...if they call that "listening" they are in serious need of a hearing aid > ...imnsho of course > > ...have a nice day :) > > William > > -------------------------------------------------- > From: "Steve Schapel" <miscellany at mvps.org> > Sent: Sunday, June 28, 2009 2:19 AM > To: "Access Developers discussion and problem solving" > <accessd at databaseadvisors.com> > Subject: Re: [AccessD] Poll on Access 2007 > > > William, > > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > From: "William Hindman" <wdhindman at dejpolsystems.com> > > Sent: Sunday, June 28, 2009 12:35 AM > > > >> ... A2k3 is the last Access tool I'll ever use. > > > > I'm sorry to hear that, William. Of course, Access 2003 is now pretty > out > > of date. I mean, soon it will be *two* versions behind. > > > > In the meantime, I know people who used to be into VB6, and FoxPro, and > > various other technologies that are gradually going extinct. Whereas it > > looks to me that Access is just reaching adolesence. What a stroke of > > luck > > that some of us hitched our wagon to the Access horse, and not one of > > those > > others. > > > > Another few weeks, and we'll start to see some more frequent public > > discussion of the Access 2010 technical preview. In spite of your > > insulting > > comments, I really hope you will see your way clear to re-consider. > > > > -- > > Regards > > Steve > > > > > > __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus > > signature database 4193 (20090626) __________ > > > > The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. > > > > http://www.eset.com > > > > > > > > -- > > AccessD mailing list > > AccessD at databaseadvisors.com > > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd > > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com > > > > -- > AccessD mailing list > AccessD at databaseadvisors.com > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com >