[AccessD] FMS Article on the new features in Access 2007

William Hindman wdhindman at dejpolsystems.com
Thu Mar 19 17:20:51 CDT 2009


...amazing it is just how different our customer environments are ...in my 
world a client dba is someone I trust to reboot the server ...their "IT 
Department" is me.
...I prefer my world :)

William

--------------------------------------------------
From: "Charlotte Foust" <cfoust at infostatsystems.com>
Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2009 6:13 PM
To: "Access Developers discussion and problem solving" 
<accessd at databaseadvisors.com>
Subject: Re: [AccessD] FMS Article on the new features in Access 2007

> That's about the most senseless thing I've ever heard!  Most IT 
> departments we deal with don't want to come within a mile of an Access app 
> and actively try to prevent their occurrence.
>
> Your customers wnt development without programming??  Are they looking for 
> spreadsheets?
>
> Charlotte Foust
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com 
> [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Hewson, Jim
> Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2009 2:55 PM
> To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving
> Subject: Re: [AccessD] FMS Article on the new features in Access 2007
>
> What I am finding that some of our customers do not want any .net 
> development or any other development that involves any type of programming 
> language.  Some of their IT departments considered it a new developed 
> software and it could take several months or longer to get approval to 
> begin the project and/or deploy it.  If the development is done in Access 
> using the tools that came with Access then the IT department considers it 
> COTS and no approval is necessary.
>
> Jim
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com 
> [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of 
> rusty.hammond at cpiqpc.com
> Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2009 4:43 PM
> To: accessd at databaseadvisors.com
> Subject: Re: [AccessD] FMS Article on the new features in Access 2007
>
> I would expand that to the office suite, not just Access.  Is it possible 
> Access was never intended to be the development tool it became, but just a 
> power user application.  Now they are trying to reel it back in and move 
> us to .net?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
> [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of David McAfee
> Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2009 4:19 PM
> To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving
> Subject: Re: [AccessD] FMS Article on the new features in Access 2007
>
> I'll Just wait for the next version.
>
> It used to be every other version of Access was not that great. I think 
> something got out of Sync.
>
> 1 -Never used it
> 2 - Good
> 95 - Bleh, hurl, <dry heave noise>
> 97 - My favorite
> 2000 - I liked it, but I think it wasnt well liked
> 2002 (Office XP) I never really used it
> 2003 - Like it
> 2007 - more dry heaving noises
>
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 2:09 PM, Max Wanadoo <max.wanadoo at gmail.com> 
> wrote:
>> With the single exception of the Datasheet Totals, there is nothing
>> fundamental,y improved for me as a developer. The quote "..get used
>> to it.." made me spit. I can get used to anything, but why have all
>> these new ways of doing what is essentially the same. Lots of "stuff"
>> is worse - David points them out below.
>> For me, I abhor the 2007. No "fundamental" improvements - with this
>> "update", beauty is not even skin deep.
>>
>> Max
>>
>>
>> On 3/19/09, David McAfee <davidmcafee at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I agree with him on these A2007 problems:
>>>
>>> Not being able to see a list of object sorted by modified date the
>>> way you'd expect in Windows Explorer.
>>>
>>> Losing Alt+D as a way to put the current object in design mode
>>>
>>> Losing the toolbar item to automatically jump to a form or report's
>>> module code
>>>
>>> Missing right mouse click items like import/export
>>>
>>> As for the Ribbon, I don't like the "Once you get used to it, its not
>>> that bad" that I hear quite often.
>>> I don't feel so many command/tol bar buttons need to be seen. As a
>>> programer, I feel I need to know what the user needs to have
>>> available to them, If they do need something that can navigate view
>>> the menus (oops, they removed them!).
>>>
>>> "Overcoming Resistance to Change
>>>
>>> For years, the Access community complained that Microsoft was
>>> abandoning Access, that they didn't invest enough in it, that the Jet
>>> Engine and DAO was dead, etc. Well, the Microsoft Access development
>>> team for Access 2007 was the largest ever and Microsoft made a huge
>>> investment that added considerable new features to Access."
>>>
>>> I never really requested change. I hoped that they wouldn't abandon
>>> Access, like was always rumored.
>>>
>>> There are a few new cool features, but they never fixed some old bugs
>>> that still go back to early versions of Access.
>>>
>>> They still haven't made a list box with .fontcolor or
>>> .selectedrowBackColor property.
>>>
>>> The datasheet totals are cool, but I should provide that for my users
>>> in their form. Remember, users shouldnt be accessing the
>>> tables/queries directly.
>>>
>>> "In Access 2007, a different approach is necessary for finding your
>>> object. Rather than visually finding it, enter some letters of the
>>> object name in the Search Bar, and the list of objects gets filtered
>>> to just those names. This makes it very easy to find objects by name
>>> -- especially text within an object name -- that wasn't possible
>>> before. Once you are used to this, it's very difficult to go back."
>>>
>>> Nah, give me my detail view. The ability to sort by Name and or date
>>> is more important to me. My naming conventions is another way for me
>>> to quickly find what I need.
>>>
>>> The Date picker is nice, but is there a way to turn it off? THey may
>>> be times where you don't want it to be displayed, or use your own
>>> instead.
>>>
>>> Just my worthless 2 cents,
>>> David
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 1:04 PM, <rusty.hammond at cpiqpc.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > I just thought I'd throw this out there and see everyone thinks.
>>> >
>>> > http://www.fmsinc.com/MicrosoftAccess/2007/Top-Features.html
>>> > <http://www.fmsinc.com/MicrosoftAccess/2007/Top-Features.html>
>>> >
>>> > It does sound like there are some nice new features. Whether they
>>> outweigh
>>> > the drawbacks...
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Rusty Hammond
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > *******************************************************************
>>> > ***
>>> > WARNING: All e-mail sent to and from this address will be received,
>>> > scanned or otherwise recorded by the CPI Qualified Plan
>>> > Consultants,
> Inc.
>>> > corporate e-mail system and is subject to archival, monitoring or
>>> > review by, and/or disclosure to, someone other than the recipient.
>>> > *******************************************************************
>>> > ***
>>> > --
>>> > AccessD mailing list
>>> > AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
>>> > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
>>> > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> AccessD mailing list
>>> AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
>>> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
>>> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
>>>
>> --
>> AccessD mailing list
>> AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
>> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
>> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
>>
>
> --
> AccessD mailing list
> AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
>
> **********************************************************************
> WARNING: All e-mail sent to and from this address will be received, 
> scanned or otherwise recorded by the CPI Qualified Plan Consultants, Inc.
> corporate e-mail system and is subject to archival, monitoring or review 
> by, and/or disclosure to, someone other than the recipient.
> **********************************************************************
> --
> AccessD mailing list
> AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com 
> ################################################################################
> If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender 
> immediately and be aware that the use, copying, or dissemination of this 
> information is prohibited. This email transmission contains information 
> from NCI Information Systems, Inc. that may be considered privileged or 
> confidential and is intended solely for the named recipient.
> ################################################################################
>
> --
> AccessD mailing list
> AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
>
> -- 
> AccessD mailing list
> AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
> 




More information about the AccessD mailing list