Mark Simms
marksimms at verizon.net
Fri Mar 20 17:17:02 CDT 2009
John - sorry to disagree. I think Clint is buried in a sea of bureaucracy. Last time I contacted him, he indicated to me that he was awaiting a committee to approve of recent blog post. Now that was quite a "tell" to me: If it's that bad for just blog posts, what about major software features ? > -----Original Message----- > From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com > [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of jwcolby > Sent: Friday, March 20, 2009 2:50 PM > To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving > Subject: Re: [AccessD] FMS Article on the new features in Access 2007 > > Mark, > > The problem with any company anywhere is that usually "a > person" is in charge. In the end that person's ideas carry > the day. If that person decides that "this is the way it is" > then all the feedback in the world won't make any difference. > > It sure looks to me like "a person" has decided that > developer friendly in not a priority in Access 2007, and in > fact they might very well have decided developer UNfriendly > is a priority. Nothing like giving us developers a firm > shove out the door to move us over to .Net. > > John W. Colby > www.ColbyConsulting.com > > > Mark Simms wrote: > > Thanks for that Charlotte. > > So bottomline, they are not listening. > > Wow. > > I wonder.... given the low sales, low adoption rate, and poor > > acceptance of Office 2007 whether or not that will change....hmmmmm. > > Food for thought. > -- > AccessD mailing list > AccessD at databaseadvisors.com > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com >