Drew Wutka
DWUTKA at Marlow.com
Mon Mar 23 17:56:38 CDT 2009
Interesting analogy, though I think it's an invalid comparison. When Boeing comes out with a new plane, they can do whatever they want with capabilities and controls, because it's a device that specially trained people use. So their market is trained people that would train on a new system if needed. Microsoft, on the other hand, has a very wide range of customers to deal with, from the highly technical (the ones that know what's going on in the machine language) to people that just want email, and everything in between. By far, one of the best OSes that MS has ever come out with was Windows 2000. It was the greatest leap of any of the generations. But it's major flaw, is that it didn't have the 'user fuzzy feeling'ness of Windows 98/ME. XP did that. XP did VERY little that Windows 2k didn't already do. Other then the look and feel, and the 'user fuzzy feeling' it brought to the NT platform (like the new control panel look, which was just as bad as the Vista one) the only thing I can think of, off the top of my head that it had in the OS that 2k didn't, was zip capability. Vista has a LOT more then XP does. Which is the double edged sword that hit them. People had gotten to like XP, and weren't willing to put up with the initial Vista issues for the new features. Really, it's just a matter of taste right now. Another issue is machine power. Vista is a heftier OS. If you have a machine that is maxing out XP's capabilities, you are using the wrong OS, it should have Vista. If you have a machine that XP just runs normally on, it's probably not hefty enough to run Vista at it's true potential. Drew -----Original Message----- From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of jwcolby Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 7:05 AM To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving Subject: Re: [AccessD] FMS Article on the new features in Access 2007 I guess the point really is change... and the ability to get rid of the change. Imagine that you are a pilot, flying a 747. You have a lot to do to get your job done. Now Boeing brings out the latest and greatest version of the same aircraft. But everything is located in a different location. Switches that do the same thing are labeled differently. You don't get much if anything BETTER, it just LOOKS DIFFERENT. That is the point. I truly do not CARE if they relabel everything for their younger audience, just give me a switch to get rid of it all and show me the original. The original worked, in most cases it was one or several clicks LESS to get to, it was tons less GUI (crap), but most importantly, it is mostly just pretty (and inefficient) crap over the same old thing. I am not arguing that there is new stuff in Vista, there absolutely is. But the pieces of the original OS that were ported into Vista were gussied up, with no way to un-gussy them. When you are trying to fly the machine, the differences are not helpful, they are just irritating. Maaaaaaaaaaaybe if you are a brand new pilot the differences are better (though I doubt it). John W. Colby www.ColbyConsulting.com The information contained in this transmission is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain II-VI Proprietary and/or II-VI Business Sensitive material. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender immediately and destroy the material in its entirety, whether electronic or hard copy. You are notified that any review, retransmission, copying, disclosure, dissemination, or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited.