[AccessD] SERIOUSLY OT: Re: An Interesting question

Max Wanadoo max.wanadoo at gmail.com
Mon Mar 30 09:29:02 CDT 2009


>the argument about what null is would disappear

IOW it would be nullified

Max



-----Original Message-----
From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
[mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Dan Waters
Sent: 30 March 2009 15:12
To: 'Access Developers discussion and problem solving'
Subject: Re: [AccessD] SERIOUSLY OT: Re: An Interesting question

YES!

I find that when I'm working with a customer group to develop an automated
process, the trickiest source of misunderstanding is terminology.  I
typically ask everyone to be aware of this and describe any terminology they
are using in discussion.  I've had to rewrite a lot of code because of this.

Dan

-----Original Message-----
From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
[mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Rocky Smolin at
Beach Access Software
Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 8:58 AM
To: 'Access Developers discussion and problem solving'
Subject: Re: [AccessD] SERIOUSLY OT: Re: An Interesting question

I find that most differences of opinion, arguments if you will, stem from
the two sides using different definitions of the same word.  In this case if
each side will spell out their definition of NULL, the argument about what
null is would disappear.  You might end up with Null(1) and Null(2) but
you'd have agreement.  When I say Null(1) is... There could be no
disagreement.  


Rocky Smolin
Beach Access Software
858-259-4334
www.e-z-mrp.com
www.bchacc.com
 


-- 
AccessD mailing list
AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com




More information about the AccessD mailing list