[AccessD] FW: An interesting "feature" in SQL Server

jwcolby jwcolby at colbyconsulting.com
Thu May 21 13:14:13 CDT 2009


And this was exactly the problem I was having, and exactly the solution I figured out.

John W. Colby
www.ColbyConsulting.com


Jim Dettman wrote:
>   Well since were back up, I'll post this again...
> 
> Jim. 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jim Dettman [mailto:jimdettman at verizon.net] 
> Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2009 8:46 AM
> To: 'Access Developers discussion and problem solving'
> Subject: RE: [AccessD] An interesting "feature" in SQL Server
> 
> 
> 
>   That one has been around for a while:
> 
>   http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q278696
> 
> Jim. 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
> [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of jwcolby
> Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2009 6:29 PM
> To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving
> Subject: [AccessD] An interesting "feature" in SQL Server
> 
> I am starting work on a database at an old client that was converted to SQL
> Server.  I discovered 
> that if I enter records into a table that contains a bit field, and that bit
> field is allowed to 
> store a null value, then any time I try to edit any field in that record
> (at least through ODBC) I 
> get a "you have attempted to update a record being edited by another user"
> kind of error message and 
> the update fails.  I had to go into Management studio and set the bit to
> either a zero or a -1 at 
> which point the edits work normally after that.
> 
> Loverly.
> 



More information about the AccessD mailing list