jwcolby
jwcolby at colbyconsulting.com
Sat Nov 21 13:27:37 CST 2009
I thought the runtime was only included in 2007. John W. Colby www.ColbyConsulting.com Rocky Smolin wrote: > I'd recommend 2003. I have a fairly complex docketing system developed for > a patent attorney which is maintained in 2003 but he runs in 2007 on some > boxes. If there are problems it's on the 2007 machines. Maybe if I > switched it over entirely to 2007 those problems might go away. But the IDE > in 2007 is so difficult, I won't do it (fortunately it's not a deal breaker > for the client). > > As far as runtime - I use Wise/Sagekey for 2003 apps and it works > flawlessly. If it's going to be runtime, it doesn't matter to them which > version, yes? > > Rocky > > > -----Original Message----- > From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com > [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of jwcolby > Sent: Saturday, November 21, 2009 9:47 AM > To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving; VBA > Subject: [AccessD] Loss leader (or just plain loss) > > A friend has approached me about building an application for a small chain > of stores to manage inventory. "Very simple". I haven't yet talked to her > about the requirements. She did say they were quoted (and rejected) a bid > of $4000 to do the job. > > If I am going to do this at all it will have to be very quick and dirty, and > would be just to help a friend. > > Is Access 2007 runtime stable? Easy or difficult to use / install / > implement on site? > > -- > John W. Colby > www.ColbyConsulting.com > -- > AccessD mailing list > AccessD at databaseadvisors.com > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com >