Rocky Smolin
rockysmolin at bchacc.com
Sun Sep 20 10:32:34 CDT 2009
I used Winfax Pro for a long time. But it doesn't work in Vista. Which was the machine I put the fax line on. So I put WF into a virtual machine. But we used the fax so infrequently that I cancelled the line and now use eFax, which is free,to receive faxes. I still send from the old fax machine - just plug in the phone line. Vista seems OK now - pretty stable but I don't do anything very much with it so I don't run into any problems. I tested Win 7 on a third machine - ran fine - again, I didn't 'stretch' it. My biggest complaint with Vista is that it seems to run much slower than XP. I haven't done enough in 7 to know. What's your experience with response times among the three Oses? O2007 is the biggest pile of poo they've released since Windows ME, IMO. I suppose if you start with O2007 and don't know anything else, you get used to it. Of course, as we know from the list, it's a developer's nightmare. Why move everything around while maintaining essentially the same functionality? Same reason, I suppose, that car makers change model designs every year. But, IIUC, O2007 did not get widespread acceptance in corporate accounts - they didn't see the need to upgrade. Over time, of course, O2007 will become the standard as new machines are loaded with it. But the worst thing I find about O2007 is that it runs at 1/2 the speed of O2003. Don't know why that should be. But my plan is to do a 'generation skipping' thing and go to O10 if it's good. Rocky -----Original Message----- From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Steve Erbach Sent: Sunday, September 20, 2009 7:46 AM To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving Subject: Re: [AccessD] Winfax Pro and Access Rocky, Are you using Vista and Office 2007 as examples of things that "ain't broke"? I don't know enough about either one. I've dabbled in Office 2007 but I skipped Vista and went right to Windows 7. I thought that Vista was pretty much "broke"...otherwise, why the panic to get out a better Windows? As to Office 2007...I have to wonder why the big change in the look and feel. Steve Erbach Neenah, WI On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 4:42 PM, Rocky Smolin <rockysmolin at bchacc.com>wrote: > If it ain't' broke... > > Think Vista and Office 2007. > > Rocky > > > -----Original Message----- > From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com > [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Steve > Erbach > Sent: Sunday, September 13, 2009 1:59 PM > To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving > Subject: Re: [AccessD] Winfax Pro and Access > > Rocky, > "Quaint" is right. But the guy has been a very loyal customer even > though I've whined continually for years to get him to upgrade his > business software from DOS to Windows. I've gotten little bits > converted...but he's quite facile with Paradox for DOS queries and > some of its programming...and he ain't a gonna change. > > Steve Erbach > > On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 2:00 PM, Rocky Smolin <rockysmolin at bchacc.com > >wrote: > > > Answer to your first question is in Steve's opening: "old > > client...who continues to use Paradox for DOS for the majority of his business..." > > How quaint. > > > > Rocky > > > -- AccessD mailing list AccessD at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com