[AccessD] Update or CancelUpdate Without Addnew or Edit

"Does that mean we hold butts to be ugly?"  Yes, generally, I believe that
to be the case.  Butts are generally ugly all by themselves, not required to
be in comparison to any other part of the anatomy.

And I believe we're talking about uncovered butts, here.  Anything can look
nice draped in a Versace or custom tailed Italian silk trousers.

Yes, there are those two standard deviations or more from the mean which
provide a certain esthetic sensibility to the observer.   By and large,
leaving aside college coeds, and thinking of my peers, now...I don't think I
want to talk about this any more.

Rocky


-----Original Message-----
From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
[mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Tina Norris
Fields
Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 6:51 AM
To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving
Subject: Re: [AccessD] Update or CancelUpdate Without Addnew or Edit

I've always wondered about "butt-ugly."  Does that mean we hold butts to be
ugly?  Or does it mean that the thing is so ugly that even its butt would be
ugly?

I've seen some really nice looking butts - so I was wondering.  :-)

T

Stuart McLachlan wrote:
> It's not pedantry - it's aestheticism.   It's just a butt-ugly word :-)
>
>   
--
AccessD mailing list
AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com