[AccessD] Update or CancelUpdate Without Addnew or Edit

Rocky,
Oh my! 
T

Rocky Smolin wrote:
> "Does that mean we hold butts to be ugly?"  Yes, generally, I believe that
> to be the case.  Butts are generally ugly all by themselves, not required to
> be in comparison to any other part of the anatomy.
>
> And I believe we're talking about uncovered butts, here.  Anything can look
> nice draped in a Versace or custom tailed Italian silk trousers.
>
> Yes, there are those two standard deviations or more from the mean which
> provide a certain esthetic sensibility to the observer.   By and large,
> leaving aside college coeds, and thinking of my peers, now...I don't think I
> want to talk about this any more.
>
> Rocky
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
> [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Tina Norris
> Fields
> Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 6:51 AM
> To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving
> Subject: Re: [AccessD] Update or CancelUpdate Without Addnew or Edit
>
> I've always wondered about "butt-ugly."  Does that mean we hold butts to be
> ugly?  Or does it mean that the thing is so ugly that even its butt would be
> ugly?
>
> I've seen some really nice looking butts - so I was wondering.  :-)
>
> T
>
> Stuart McLachlan wrote:
>   
>> It's not pedantry - it's aestheticism.   It's just a butt-ugly word :-)
>>
>>   
>>     
> --
> AccessD mailing list
> AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
>
>