jwcolby
jwcolby at colbyconsulting.com
Fri Apr 9 10:15:56 CDT 2010
Jürgen Using a SSD really only works if the database is mostly read-only. SSDs will wear out in a heartbeat if they are written to 24/7. OTOH if they are read-only, they can be accessed MUCH faster, they can process thousands or even tens of thousands of IOPS per second. I personally have a need for this, but not the bucks. Sigh. John W. Colby www.ColbyConsulting.com Jurgen Welz wrote: > Registration is a pain. I clicked behind the registration message, copied and pasted the web page into Word, killed he 2nd and 3rd columns and then widened the first. The entire article was available that way. It's a bit interesting to know how the big boys play, but even companies like my parent company, that did over 2 billion in construction volume last year, aren't looking at this hardware yet. Even with over 1500 users on their SQL database. What really matters is whether users can get their work completed in a timely fashion. > > Ciao > > Jürgen Welz > > Edmonton, Alberta > > jwelz at hotmail.com > > > >> From: max.wanadoo at gmail.com >> To: accessd at databaseadvisors.com >> Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 16:08:26 +0100 >> Subject: Re: [AccessD] This just in >> >> >> This requires registration. >> >> Max >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> >> One SQL Server system on SSD >> >> http://www.sqlservercentral.com/articles/SSD+Disks/69693/ >> >> -- >> John W. Colby >> www.ColbyConsulting.com > > _________________________________________________________________ > Live connected. Get Hotmail & Messenger on your phone. > http://go.microsoft.com/?linkid=9724462