Drew Wutka
DWUTKA at Marlow.com
Tue Apr 27 09:25:55 CDT 2010
Hmmmmmm, interesting. I really need to be getting more sleep...... 5| 10| 15| 20| 25| 30| 35| 40| 45| 50| 55| 60| 65| 70| 75| 80| 85| 90| 95|100| eye|eye|eye|eye|eye|eye|eye|eye|eye|eye|eye|eye|eye|eye| | | | | | | | | | | |ear|ear|ear|ear|ear|ear|ear|ear|ear|ear|ear|ear|ear|ear|ear| arm|arm|arm|arm| | | | | |arm|arm|arm|arm|arm|arm|arm|arm|arm|arm|arm| leg|leg|leg|leg|leg|leg|leg|leg|leg| | | |leg|leg|leg|leg|leg|leg|leg|leg| 65 and 70 are the only overlaps there. Go figure. Can't learn if you don't admit your wrong sometimes! ;) Drew -----Original Message----- From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of William Hindman Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 8:39 PM To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving Subject: Re: [AccessD] OT: Friday Puzzles Drew ...this is a well known puzzle with literally hundreds, if not thousands, of proofs posted across the net. ...bing Lewis Carroll pensioner puzzle ...the minimum is 10, not 45. William -------------------------------------------------- From: "Drew Wutka" <DWUTKA at marlow.com> Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 5:55 PM To: "Access Developers discussion and problem solving" <accessd at databaseadvisors.com> Subject: Re: [AccessD] OT: Friday Puzzles > I am really curious where you guys are getting this 'math' error.' > > Here is the puzzle, as posted: > > " At the end of a battle, the general regrouped his soldiers. They had > done badly. 70% of them had lost, at least, one eye. 75% had lost at > least one ear. 80% had lost, at minimum, an arm. 85% of the soldiers had > lost one leg. > The general wants to know how many of his men had lost, at minimum, one > eye, one ear, one arm and one leg. He is stingy with the medals so he > wants to reward the fewest number of soldiers. What percentage of the > soldiers should receive medals? You have 5 minutes to decide." > > Using that statement, as worded, if there are 100 soldiers in the > general's group: > > 70 lost an eye > > 75 lost an ear > > 80 lost an arm > > 85 lost a leg > > So unless you use faulty logic that there are really 310 soldiers, there > are at a MAXIMUM of 70 that lost all four body parts, and a minimum of > 45. > > Drew > > -----Original Message----- > From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com > [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Max Wanadoo > Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 12:01 PM > To: 'Access Developers discussion and problem solving' > Subject: Re: [AccessD] OT: Friday Puzzles > > He was on the right track but his arithmetic is flawed. > > I had already posted the graphical answer. No doubt he cribbed his idea > from mine - but that is Code Boy for you...!! > > You on the other hand are....well, on the other hand... > > Max > > > -----Original Message----- > From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com > [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of William > Hindman > Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 5:38 PM > To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving > Subject: Re: [AccessD] OT: Friday Puzzles > > ...you and Drew ...birds of a feather ...and both wrong ;) > > William > > -------------------------------------------------- > From: "Max Wanadoo" <max.wanadoo at gmail.com> > Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 2:59 AM > To: "'Access Developers discussion and problem solving'" > <accessd at databaseadvisors.com> > Subject: Re: [AccessD] OT: Friday Puzzles > >> >> >> No need. Clean as a whistle. >> >> Min # with all 4 is 1. >> Max # with all 4 is 75 >> Max # with diff(least + most) is 55 >> QED >> >> Just suffle these up and down the line and you will see. X=injury 0 = > no >> injury. >> >> >> > xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > xxxx >> xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> >> > 000000000000000xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > xxxx >> xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> >> > 000000000000000xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > xxxx >> xxxxxxxxxxxxxx0000000000 >> >> > 0000000000xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > xxxx >> xxxxxxxxxxxxxx0000000000 >> >> >> >> Max >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com >> [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of William > Hindman >> Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 3:10 AM >> To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving >> Subject: Re: [AccessD] OT: Friday Puzzles >> >> >> ...did you wipe that carefully after extracting it? :) >> >> William >> >> -------------------------------------------------- >> From: "Max Wanadoo" <max.wanadoo at gmail.com> >> Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 1:52 AM >> To: "'Access Developers discussion and problem solving'" >> <accessd at databaseadvisors.com> >> Subject: Re: [AccessD] OT: Friday Puzzles >> >>> >>> >>> I say 55% of whatever value is applied. >>> >>> Max >>> >>> >>> "The general wants to know how many of his men had lost, at minimum, > one >>> eye, >>> one ear, one arm and one leg. He is stingy with the medals so he > wants to >>> reward the fewest number of soldiers. What percentage of the soldiers >>> should >>> receive medals? >>> >>> ...if the query were what was the minimum % of soldiers who had lost > all >>> 4 >>> body parts, the answer would be 10% >>> >>> ...but the query was "how many of his men had lost, at minimum, one > eye, >>> one ear, one arm and one leg" and that could be anywhere between 10% > and >>> 70% >>> >>> ...there is insufficient data to provide an answer to the query > posited >>> ...imnsho of course :) >>> >>> William >>> >>> >>> -- >>> AccessD mailing list >>> AccessD at databaseadvisors.com >>> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd >>> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com >>> >> >> -- >> AccessD mailing list >> AccessD at databaseadvisors.com >> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd >> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com >> >> -- >> AccessD mailing list >> AccessD at databaseadvisors.com >> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd >> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com >> > > -- > AccessD mailing list > AccessD at databaseadvisors.com > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com > > -- > AccessD mailing list > AccessD at databaseadvisors.com > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com > The information contained in this transmission is intended only for the > person or entity > to which it is addressed and may contain II-VI Proprietary and/or II-VI > Business > Sensitive material. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact > the sender > immediately and destroy the material in its entirety, whether electronic > or hard copy. > You are notified that any review, retransmission, copying, disclosure, > dissemination, > or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this information > by persons > or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. > > > -- > AccessD mailing list > AccessD at databaseadvisors.com > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com > -- AccessD mailing list AccessD at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com The information contained in this transmission is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain II-VI Proprietary and/or II-VI Business Sensitive material. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender immediately and destroy the material in its entirety, whether electronic or hard copy. You are notified that any review, retransmission, copying, disclosure, dissemination, or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited.