Max Wanadoo
max.wanadoo at gmail.com
Thu Jan 28 07:54:01 CST 2010
still obfuscation however. All those LETS and GETS just to parse a string. max On 28/01/2010, jwcolby <jwcolby at colbyconsulting.com> wrote: > It was suggested as A solution, and it was suggested because it is a trivial > solution to a trivial task. > > Classes are not rocket science. I was not suggesting a framework. Two > classes is 5 minutes (for > me). A TRIVIAL solution to a trivial problem, but it has the advantage of > reusability. > > You make it sound as if doing it with a pair of classes is going to take a > week. And I suppose it > might take YOU a week. And if that is the case then... > > a) You need to become more fluent in classes. > b) This is a TRIVIAL exercise which would provide a good platform for > becoming more comfortable with > classes. > c) You need to knock out the problem any way you can and then come back and > learn enough about > classes that it is trivial to you as well. > > This is a TRIVIAL problem and FOR ME the solution using a pair of classes is > trivial as well. I > have always challenged everyone on this list to become so good with classes > that it is trivial for > you as well. > > You resist Max, your loss. Just because you can't knock out a class > solution doesn't mean it is a > hammer. It simply means that to YOU it is a hammer. > > John W. Colby > www.ColbyConsulting.com > > > Max Wanadoo wrote: >> No, but a hammer (aka class) is what was presented to Darren as a >> solution to a trivial (specific) task. >> >> A rose by any name... >> >> max > -- > AccessD mailing list > AccessD at databaseadvisors.com > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com >