Charlotte Foust
charlotte.foust at gmail.com
Tue Jul 27 15:26:05 CDT 2010
Just one point: Access itself is not necessarily simpler or less expensive than visual studio. VS has a steeper learning curve from VBA than Access. However, VS Express and SQL Express are both free, so leave expense (except training costs) out of the equation. Charlotte Foust On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 1:09 PM, Brad Marks <BradM at blackforestltd.com> wrote: > All, > > I would like to thank everyone who contributed to my question regarding the future of Microsoft Access. > > It was interesting to see the various responses. For the most part, I feel comfortable moving forward with the use of Access in the small business environment. I believe that there are many small firms where Access can be employed for small, economical, and yet effective systems. > > I know that Access does not have all of the bells and whistles that Visual Studio has. On the other hand, if business needs can be met with the less expensive and simpler Access environment, why not go this route? > > Thanks again for your insights. I have learned many things from this group and I truly appreciated the assistance. > > Brad > > -- > AccessD mailing list > AccessD at databaseadvisors.com > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com > >