Dan Waters
dwaters at usinternet.com
Tue Mar 23 17:23:17 CDT 2010
Hi Stuart, I'm sorry I didn't post this yesterday. From now on, I'll post everything yesterday! ;-) Dan -----Original Message----- From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Stuart McLachlan Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2010 4:32 PM To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving Subject: Re: [AccessD] Binding forms and controls directly to SQL Server Why didn't you post that yesterday! I'd forgotten about the bit field problem. I was working on updating some Access applications I put together a few years ago and couldn't work out why I could create new records but couldn't edit existing ones in an app which hasn't been used for a few years (this is part of a 5 year election cycle) Took me a long time to work out that it was a new bit field that had been added to the table since this particular application was last used. -- Stuart On 23 Mar 2010 at 8:22, Dan Waters wrote: > Are you using ODBC table links? If so, then it's the same as if you were > linking to an Access BE. > > Although you need to set the Bit (Yes/No) fields in SQL Server to not allow > nulls. > > Dan -- AccessD mailing list AccessD at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com