Stuart McLachlan
stuart at lexacorp.com.pg
Tue Aug 23 14:47:26 CDT 2011
You obviously don't read the BOFH. :-) -- Stuart On 23 Aug 2011 at 11:41, William Benson wrote: > I don't actually necessarily agree with this. IT often reports up to > chief information officer or chief operating officer and these guys > pound on them all the time. Where are the savings, how soon can we > have it online, what assurances from the vendor? How are we > positioning ourselves for growth. > > I think the problem is short sighted budgets. > On Aug 23, 2011 11:29 AM, "Susan Harkins" <ssharkins at gmail.com> wrote: > >> 2) in many large corps, very little "IT" is actually being > performed in >> the >> IT departments. >> It's mostly all about > justifying one's existence (and pay/benefits >> !!)....as >> well >> > as the management of a pool of temps/contract employees. >> And IT > protects itself well with lax deadlines and deliverables. >> However, > if you end-up being assigned to an END-USER department, be >> prepared > >> for quite the opposite.... >> High pressure....low pay. > > > > ========I've definitely seen both ends of this at play, even in good > > companies where I didn't expect this kind of subterfuge. Nobody can > protect > themselves like IT folks -- it's because the whole thing's a > mystery to > everyone else. IT can say anything and everyone else just > has to go along. > > Susan H. > > -- > AccessD mailing list > > AccessD at databaseadvisors.com > > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd > Website: > http://www.databaseadvisors.com -- AccessD mailing list > AccessD at databaseadvisors.com > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd Website: > http://www.databaseadvisors.com >