[AccessD] Requirements (was: I should be able to do this-resolved)

ROTFLMAO!!!
T

Tina Norris Fields
tinanfields at torchlake.com
231-322-2787


On 12/8/2011 2:29 PM, Brad Marks wrote:
> "Weeks of Computer Programming Can Save You Hours of Planning"
>
> :-)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
> [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Dan Waters
> Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2011 7:47 AM
> To: 'Access Developers discussion and problem solving'
> Subject: Re: [AccessD] Requirements (was: I should be able to do this
> -resolved)
>
> Requirements are more important.  You can't build a good house with bad
> plans - no matter how good the builders are!
>
> Dan
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com
> [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Mark Simms
> Sent: Thursday, December 08, 2011 7:38 AM
> To: 'Access Developers discussion and problem solving'
> Subject: Re: [AccessD] I should be able to do this - resolved
>
> Re: "......someone mentioned that the company uses 360-day years"
>
> Oh boy, here we go with a fundamental issue that should have come out
> way
> back in the requirements definition.
> The best programmers in the world cannot overcome something like this.
> On the other hand, the best analysts cannot overcome bugs caused by
> crappy
> coding.
>
> So what's more important: the analysis or the coding ?
>
>
>
> --
> AccessD mailing list
> AccessD at databaseadvisors.com
> http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd
> Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com
>