jwcolby
jwcolby at colbyconsulting.com
Tue Feb 8 15:12:15 CST 2011
> No one should be able to build a web site with any tool until they can prove they can build a commercial site with note-pad. ;-) Likewise an access database and a database. ;) John W. Colby www.ColbyConsulting.com On 2/8/2011 3:45 PM, Jim Lawrence wrote: > No one should be able to build a web site with any tool until they can prove > they can build a commercial site with note-pad. ;-) > > Jim > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com > [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Drew Wutka > Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2011 11:30 AM > To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving > Subject: Re: [AccessD] From a reader > > The funny thing is, the reason Access gets such a bad name is that it > can be used by amateurs, and when that happens, you get clunky. > > A professional Access developer understands what an .mdb is. They > understand the inner-workings enough to optimize performance. > > This is the same reason so many 'clunky' web applications have been > made. > > How many Access pro's could tell you EXACTLY what Jet is doing when you > are running 'SELECT * FROM tblSomething WHERE ID=1' against a table in a > backend .mdb? Probably very few. How many could give you a conceptual > statement as to what is happening, like 'Jet is reading the index values > from the b/e .mdb, and then using that information to determine where to > start reading the table data'? Probably most. Yet how many 'amateurs' > have even a conceptual understanding? They don't need to, Access just > does things for them. > > Same problem with the web. There are a WIDE variety of tools available, > that let someone with little to no understanding of a > website/webserver/browser system throw a 'fully functioning' (<--- term > used very loosely) 'website' (<---also used very loosely) up into > production. It has been this way for a while. > > Drew > > -----Original Message----- > From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com > [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Mark Simms > Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2011 8:30 PM > To: 'Access Developers discussion and problem solving' > Subject: Re: [AccessD] From a reader > > I just LOVE that word "Clunky" to describe a web app !! > > When everyone says how great the web is, I just point out all of the > "clunky" webapps I have to tolerate....from my bank, to my insurance > company, and on and on it goes. Then I get to a client site and have to > tolerate all of THEIR clunky webapps. They are slow, they don't respond, > they forget to validate, etc, etc., they don't integrate with windows, > they > don't cut-and-paste properly, and the list just goes on forever. > > I'm going for a long, long winternight's sleep. Someone wake me up when > all > clunky web apps have been upgraded to Web 2.0 standards. > > >> make it 'look' like an access combobox, and act like it, but what's >> happening in the background is clunky. First, .Net is creating >> javascript on the client side that is reacting to the 'OnClick' of the >> combobox (or index changed event), then it's sending all the current > >