[AccessD] SQL Server advice

>
> I do agree with Arthur however, you would be well served to just go
> with 2008.  2000 is very old.
>
That being said....I was at one shop....and they were paranoid to upgrade
even to 2005 because of potential performance degradation.
IOW: that ancient release was kind of lean-and-mean for the hardware they
were running.
With hardware so cheap today...no excuse not to "move up".