Kenneth Ismert
kismert at gmail.com
Thu Sep 22 18:57:49 CDT 2011
I'm sorry that you felt my remarks were unkind. You have done your own research, and have taken steps to mitigate the risks by limiting how your SSDs are used. And you are planning for failure with a robust backup scheme using traditional HDDs. Still, my first experience with an SSD out of the box was that the firmware had a critical bug, which required an update that wasn't available, because the maker needed a lot of time to test the revision. It seems likely that the real cause is that the drive, being a consumer level product, didn't have enough capacitance built-in to shut down gracefully during a power outage. Maybe we made a poor choice, but the device was from a dominant player in the industry. Not a confidence builder. Also, some of your own comments don't bolster your overall glowing endorsement. To wit: the SSD's with the 34 micron chips are good but the new 28 micron chips are bad? That sounds like caveat emptor to me. Problems with scaling down and firmware issues sound to me like indicators of a technology that is still not mature enough to be suitable as drop-in replacements for HDDs in a broad range of server applications. And yes, the one source I quoted does sound like a guy fishing for consulting work, but you conveniently neglected to criticize my other reference, who said things more central to my point, and who seems more credible. Certainly, the technology will mature, and adoption rates will climb. Operating systems that optimize for SSDs will become more popular. Right now, for our server installation, I'm content to wait it out. -Ken