Stuart McLachlan
stuart at lexacorp.com.pg
Mon Apr 16 19:13:04 CDT 2012
In this case, I don't think that "flawed" is the right word. "Simplistic" would be better. Newton's approach is a simplified model of reality, which matches observations within certain constraints. It is only beyond those constraints that newtonian laws break down. Einsteins approach is a more complex model, which widens those constraints. Current string/multiverse/brane approaches are more complex again and further widen those constraints. Each appears to be getting closer to reality, but whether we will ever get there is another matter. -- Stuart On 16 Apr 2012 at 23:59, Darryl Collins wrote: > *shrugs*.... I have to agree with you. Actually we already know this > from Physics. Newton's approach to time, space and gravity 'seems' > right to us as it is so much more intuitive, and indeed even works - > we still use it today, but Einstein showed it is flawed and reality is > nothing like we 'believe' it to be. >