Mark Simms
marksimms at verizon.net
Fri Nov 9 11:09:54 CST 2012
No, you missed that last post about the 2013 changes. It's a long blog....and one of the reasons I kinda hate blogging. Blogs need to be short articles that are properly catalogued and cross-referenced. Agreed - with no powerful language support, those apps are toys. Why Microsoft didn't go with full Javascript support and a VBA to Javascript translator is beyond me. That's a no brainer. Then again, I don't see much in the way of clear thinking coming from Redmond any more. > -----Original Message----- > From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:accessd- > bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Gustav Brock > Sent: Friday, November 09, 2012 8:08 AM > To: 'Access Developers discussion and problem solving' > Subject: Re: [AccessD] Access Services changed in 2013 release > > Hi Jim > > I'll stress it; I didn't understand the article at all. Further, it is > so > old that it can't (and doesn't) have any relation to the 2013 release. > Mark? Too many beers? > > /gustav > > -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- > Fra: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com > [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] På vegne af Jim Dettman > Sendt: 9. november 2012 13:49 > Til: 'Access Developers discussion and problem solving' > Emne: Re: [AccessD] Access Services changed in 2013 release > > > Unless I've really missed the point of something, he's totally off- > base > with that article. > > "In the end Access 2010 provides the existing Access developer with a > path > upwards to the wonderful Browser-based world without giving up any of > the > capabilities of the Client version of Access" > > That's true only if you maintain a "desktop" style app. To publish to > SharePoint, it must be a web database and that's the only thing you can > use > in the browser. Web databases have limited functionality in terms of > forms > and events, and only a limited Marco set is available. Reporting is > not > available in a web database either, so I'm not sure why he's talking > about > moving forms and reports to the web. > > I'll have to read through it again when I have time, but it seems way > off-base to me. > > Jim. > > -----Original Message----- > From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com > [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Mark Simms > Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2012 06:07 PM > To: 'Access Developers discussion and problem solving' > Subject: [AccessD] Access Services changed in 2013 release > > http://dmoffat.wordpress.com/2009/11/06/access-2010-and-sharepoint- > welcome-t > o-the-hybrid-access-application/ > Interesting comments here.....looks like MSFT made another drastic > change to > the hybrid model. > > > > -- > AccessD mailing list > AccessD at databaseadvisors.com > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com > > -- > AccessD mailing list > AccessD at databaseadvisors.com > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com > > > -- > AccessD mailing list > AccessD at databaseadvisors.com > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com