John W Colby
jwcolby at gmail.com
Fri Dec 13 16:49:06 CST 2013
Yea, I agree Charlotte. IBM doesn't like Access but they also consider web (browser) based apps a security weakness FWICT. So while they do actively discourage Access, they replace it with another desktop app, in C# or java. John W. Colby Reality is what refuses to go away when you do not believe in it On 12/13/2013 5:41 PM, Charlotte Foust wrote: > Jim, > > It may take a bit more killing IMO. I've got a division of a State of > California governmental department that specified an Access database so > they could avoid the problems their parent department encountered (and > presumably still encounter) with a large IT-sanctioned system design. > These guys wanted to learn from their department's mistakes. > > Charlotte > > > On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 12:38 PM, Jim Dettman <jimdettman at verizon.net>wrote: > >> I got the same thing here. It's only triggered if the form displays no >> records at all (part I missed in my earlier tests). >> >> << >> Which tells me that they haven't decided that bugs are an important >> thing to work on, even in 2013. >> Only if it is on the web side. >> >> Development on the desktop side is dead if anyone hasn't figured it out >> already. >> >> Jim. >>