Gary Kjos
garykjos at gmail.com
Thu Feb 21 12:59:23 CST 2013
Hi Doug, I appreciate your input. I have one comment to your comment on having things "Organized by Discussion". This can maybe be met by using a different email client. For example I use gmail for list mail and it organizes everything for me by thread, essentially by subject. Threads show up as a single line on the main mail list. If I'm interested I can open the thread and see all the messages in that thread. For subjects I don't care about, I don't open the thread.I'm not saying gmail is the be all email for everyone but it works fabulously for list mail. I would guess that other email clients could probably do a similar thing with an option selection. GK On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 12:23 PM, Doug Murphy <dw-murphy at cox.net> wrote: > As A mostly lurker, question asker and sometime question answerer I'll chime > in on this discussion. I learned about this list from Rocky, a fellow Access > User Group of San Diego member. When I first signed up many years ago there > was lots of interchange and debate on some really interesting questions. I > learned a lot. Being a lone developer, aside from our user group I don't get > to discuss Access as a development environment with too many people. This > was great. > > As has been pointed out the list seems to have lost the Q/A, technical > interchange focus. Also the format is antiquated. I have been spending more > time on the LinkedIn Professional Microsoft Access Developers' Network > (PMADN) group. The format is great as it is organized by discussion so if > you're not interested you don't need to look. As can be seem from this > group, PMADN, there is still quite a bit of technical interchange on Access > and development. > > It is possible that the technical discussion has moved on to forums like > PMADN, UtterAccess , or StackOverFlow where personality and community > aren't the focus but technical discussion and question answer is. New Access > folks are looking for information, not who we are or what we used to do. > > My thoughts. > > Doug > > -----Original Message----- > From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com > [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Kenneth Ismert > Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 8:53 AM > To: accessd at databaseadvisors.com > Subject: Re: [AccessD] AccessD never changes > > Change is inevitable. Right now, entropy is winning, and AccessD is slowly > fading into background noise. > > This is a group using antique technology to serve antique people. > Seriously, is anyone here under 40? I bet very few. Anyone under 30? I'd be > shocked if we had more than a token number. > > Nothing I have read in this current conversation indicates that anything has > changed for the positive. As far as I can tell: > > * We are still in the long tail of decline, both in overall postings and > on-topic postings. > * The number of active participants is slowly declining > > Of course, I am ready to be proven wrong. The people running AccessD can > release numbers showing whether we are trending up or down. > > That hasn't happened yet, and probably for good reason. > > The facts are depressing. > > -Ken > -- > AccessD mailing list > AccessD at databaseadvisors.com > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com > > -- > AccessD mailing list > AccessD at databaseadvisors.com > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com -- Gary Kjos garykjos at gmail.com