John W Colby
jwcolby at gmail.com
Thu Jan 24 09:05:14 CST 2013
My actual desktop is just a workstation, a dual core with 3 gigs running XP Professional X32. It is not a server machine. When I look at the Citrix machine properties I see a quad core with 16 gigs ram running Windows 2003 R2 X64. So my workstation can run things local or can start a Citrix instance. My machine is not a server running Citrix for other people to remote in. John W. Colby Reality is what refuses to go away when you do not believe in it On 1/24/2013 9:42 AM, Dan Waters wrote: > Hi John, > > One of my customers has my Access system on their Citrix server. Citrix is > an application that is installed on a server. It is designed to allow users > to run some or all their software on the server, while they are physically > somewhere else. This turns their desktop PC into just a terminal for the > applications the use via Citrix. > > In my customer's case, the purpose of Citrix is to allow users who are not > connected to the LAN at their headquarters in Minneapolis to run my system > at a reasonable level of performance. (As we all know, Access on a WAN > doesn't work.) It works pretty well, with users at many locations in the > US, Mexico, and also Asia. Also, when people are away from work with their > laptop, they can log into the company network with a VPN, then log into > Citrix, and then log into my system - and still get reasonable performance. > > > However, all the people who connect to the LAN log into my Access system > directly using separate FE's on their PC's - it's noticeable faster than > logging into Citrix. > > Companies might also use a Citrix server for all PC's on their LAN so that > everyone's PC is essentially a terminal. This can give the IT department a > high degree of control over app versions, preventing the installation of > personal apps, etc. > > But why you would be given a PC which is actually a server with Citrix on it > for your personal use is beyond what I know. I'd say take some of those > developers out to lunch and find out what's really going on! > > Good Luck! > Dan > > -----Original Message----- > From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com > [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of John W Colby > Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 7:37 AM > To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving > Subject: [AccessD] Citrix > > I got a contract for IBM over in Research Triangle Park Durham NC. They > assigned me a desktop computer for now which I am given admin rights on. It > run Windows XP Professional x32 and has 3 gigs of RAM. > > Many of the developers install everything on their desktop and work from > there however the official mantra is that we are supposed to use a Citrix > machine provided to us. I have never used Citrix before. Assuming it would > also be Windows XP I checked this morning and imagine my surprise when it > claims to be Windows 2003 R2 X64 with 4 cores and 16 gigs RAM. > > My question then is what does this really mean, i.e.how does Citrix work? > It is it an emulation of the real machine behind it? Is the actual server a > quad core with 16 gigs running Server 2003 R2 X64? Or is it a virtual > machine with N cores and X gigs emulated? > > In any case I do not have admin rights on that machine so every time I make > any change in Access which would go to the registry it holds the changes > until I log off Citrix and then the next time in things are back to the > original configuration. Likewise I cannot install anything myself, and > getting anything installed is not a trivial task. I like to use MZ-Tools > with Access, and I can install it local, but it is not on IBM's "approved > vendor list" so it will never be used on the Citrix machine. > > Oh the joy. > > -- > John W. Colby > > Reality is what refuses to go away > when you do not believe in it > > -- > AccessD mailing list > AccessD at databaseadvisors.com > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com >