Darryl Collins
darryl at whittleconsulting.com.au
Thu May 30 19:42:21 CDT 2013
Agreed, If you are just upload the tables that should be too much of an issue -depending on which back end you end up using, the quality of the source data and the relationships between that data / tables. Application? Agree with Stuart. Far better off starting from scratch. Hell you would probably be anyway. I haven't known anyone to use 2.0 for years (maybe decades?) Cheers Darryl -----Original Message----- From: accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com [mailto:accessd-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Stuart McLachlan Sent: Friday, 31 May 2013 8:25 AM To: Access Developers discussion and problem solving Subject: Re: [AccessD] 2.0 to web-enabled Database or Access Application? If it's just a database, it's simple (as long as you have an intermediate version of Access available to upgrade the v2 to 97 first)/ If it's an application - fugedabadit. Start fresh. On 30 May 2013 at 16:23, Susan Harkins wrote: > A reader wants to know what it would take to convert a 2.0 database to > a fully functioning web-enabled database. I want to tell him to start > over -- how about you guys? > > Susan H. > > -- > AccessD mailing list > AccessD at databaseadvisors.com > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com > -- AccessD mailing list AccessD at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com