Stuart McLachlan
stuart at lexacorp.com.pg
Mon Jun 2 15:37:06 CDT 2014
Yes, ODBC is different, you do have to relink them. On 2 Jun 2014 at 14:27, Gary Kjos wrote: > Well that is different in ODBC links then perhaps. At least in the > versions I have been using. When Oracle table changes are made I won't > see them until I refresh the links. > > GK > > > On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 2:15 PM, Stuart McLachlan > <stuart at lexacorp.com.pg> wrote: > > > Nope, you don't need to refesh links unless you add or delete > > tables. > > Structure changes are > > detected automagically. > > > > It's also a good idea to to take regular backup copies when > > developing :) > > > > -- > > Stuart > > > > On 2 Jun 2014 at 13:13, Gary Kjos wrote: > > > > > That is certainly a good idea once you have the thing done but it > > > can be a pain during development as you may be adding fields and > > > indexes and such and having the data split up front can add work > > > as you would need to refresh links many times potentially. > > > > > > At least that is how I remember it from my develop for others > > > days. > > > > > > GK > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 1:06 PM, Jim Lawrence <accessd at shaw.ca> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi Gary: > > > > > > > > I would also add that it is a good idea to separate the actual > > > > data tables from the rest of the application. > > > > > > > > Jim > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Gary Kjos > > > garykjos at gmail.com > > > -- > > > AccessD mailing list > > > AccessD at databaseadvisors.com > > > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd > > > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com > > > > > > > > > -- > > AccessD mailing list > > AccessD at databaseadvisors.com > > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd > > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com > > > > > > -- > Gary Kjos > garykjos at gmail.com > -- > AccessD mailing list > AccessD at databaseadvisors.com > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com >