Jim Lawrence
accessd at shaw.ca
Mon Jun 2 16:40:00 CDT 2014
"It's also a good idea to to take regular backup copies when developing :)" Now that is a gimme. Jim ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stuart McLachlan" <stuart at lexacorp.com.pg> To: "Access Developers discussion and problem solving" <accessd at databaseadvisors.com> Sent: Monday, June 2, 2014 12:15:27 PM Subject: Re: [AccessD] corrupt database - backup rather out-dated. Nope, you don't need to refesh links unless you add or delete tables. Structure changes are detected automagically. It's also a good idea to to take regular backup copies when developing :) -- Stuart On 2 Jun 2014 at 13:13, Gary Kjos wrote: > That is certainly a good idea once you have the thing done but it can > be a pain during development as you may be adding fields and indexes > and such and having the data split up front can add work as you would > need to refresh links many times potentially. > > At least that is how I remember it from my develop for others days. > > GK > > > On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 1:06 PM, Jim Lawrence <accessd at shaw.ca> wrote: > > > Hi Gary: > > > > I would also add that it is a good idea to separate the actual data > > tables from the rest of the application. > > > > Jim > > > > > -- > Gary Kjos > garykjos at gmail.com > -- > AccessD mailing list > AccessD at databaseadvisors.com > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com > -- AccessD mailing list AccessD at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com