Jim Lawrence
accessd at shaw.ca
Mon Mar 24 20:50:07 CDT 2014
Hi Bill: I made my livelihood, for almost ten years supporting various franchises...none of them could do without a POS system...there is probably a hundred different flavours of POS systems out there. Every company had their own special products. Some of the senior company programmers had worked their entire lives on a particular product version...it is amazing how many proprietary packages are out there built on just about every database you have heard of and many, I would bet, you have never heard of. In the bigger centres, or any place where there is reliable internet, everything is going web based. Unfortunately, MS Access has never managed to be considered appropriate for either corporate desktops or the web. The product, though it has an immense list of features, has suffered the same fate as now has befallen IE and Windows 8.x. Once, the curse of the developer community has been placed on a product no amount of advertising dollars can bring it back from oblivion. Jim ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bill Benson" <bensonforums at gmail.com> To: "Access Developers discussion and problem solving" <accessd at databaseadvisors.com> Sent: Monday, March 24, 2014 5:23:10 PM Subject: Re: [AccessD] Unbound Form Check For Changes A huge number of businesses use outsourced IT, no IT at all, or canned SW. Many would say that they survive on web mail, a smartphone, and either a tablet or a Mac or both. What does being a small business necessarily have to do with using a database, a lot tools are pay as you go for them... or they use Google Docs. I know people who use Word as their database, more who use Excel, but many medical practices and shopkeepers, cab companies- use special business management sw for their industry including contact mgt, POS, payroll, and billing... and an accountant who tells them what to file. They sure as heck aren't asking for custom development in Access. On Mar 24, 2014 7:23 PM, "John W Colby" <jwcolby at gmail.com> wrote: > At the insurance company call center I wrote, they had 25 users in all day > and no sign of slowness. Their problem became (after 9 years) that their > DATA outgrew the MDB containers. And yet they refused to even discuss a > SQL Server express solution. Of course at that time the SQL Server Express > limited you to 2 gig containers which was not much help. > > The thing about any company is that often there are different databases, > with different usage patterns. It is pretty certain that in a 100 person > company, there will never be 100 people in the database. > > Furthermore the numbers say that over 4 million of those companies have > less than 20 people. > > There is simply no argument that SQL Server Express would be a superior > solution, even for these very small companies, but MDBs work fine there as > well. > > John W. Colby > > Reality is what refuses to go away > when you do not believe in it > > On 3/24/2014 7:00 PM, Jim Lawrence wrote: > >> Hi John: >> >> Valid numbers but what is the maximum number of people that can really >> use a bound version of the MDB. I have never seen more than about twenty >> people (maybe less) and even at times, with that small number, with heavy >> usage things were really grinding. >> >> For the big numbers in data and users, I am still a real ADO fan. >> >> Jim >> >> >> > > --- > This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus > protection is active. > http://www.avast.com > > -- > AccessD mailing list > AccessD at databaseadvisors.com > http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd > Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com > -- AccessD mailing list AccessD at databaseadvisors.com http://databaseadvisors.com/mailman/listinfo/accessd Website: http://www.databaseadvisors.com