Francisco H Tapia
my.lists at verizon.net
Mon Nov 24 10:34:47 CST 2003
Run Query Analyzer to check the execution plan for each of the procedures that you ARE running. It is possible that you may need to add/remove indexes from tables in order to optimze your return. -- -Francisco Martin Reid wrote: >Sorry > >50 thousand records > >Using an unbound Access app and I need to bring all 50000 at one go to the >form. I cannot change this as all records have to be available. > >Takes 3 seconds to open and populate the form using a number of stored >procedures and recordsets. I was wondering if there was a faster way to do >this. > > >Martin > > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Erwin Craps" <Erwin.Craps at ithelps.be> >To: <dba-sqlserver at databaseadvisors.com> >Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2003 8:31 PM >Subject: RE: [dba-SQLServer]Large recordsets > > > > >>Martin, >> >>Your question is not very clear to me. >>What is it that you want to do? >>I don't see what the prob is with "only" 50.000 records. >> >>Erwin >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: dba-sqlserver-bounces at databaseadvisors.com >>[mailto:dba-sqlserver-bounces at databaseadvisors.com] On Behalf Of Martin >>Reid >>Sent: Sunday, November 23, 2003 9:03 PM >>To: dba-sqlserver at databaseadvisors.com >>Subject: [dba-SQLServer]Large recordsets >> >>I have to return perhaps in access of 50,000 records for use in Access. >>Linked to SQL Server 2000 >> >>What would be the fastest approach to take. >> >>Comments appreciated. >> >>Yeah I know the obvious, filter them first. But for the moment I am not >>allowed. to. >> >> >>Martin >> >> >>